User talk:BrokenSphere

Hello and welcome to the wiki. First, let me thank you for your enthusiasm and the edits you've made to the content of some of our pages. With that out of the way, to the issue. Please keep in mind that the Weapons category is a category that you yourself created only yesterday. While I do believe that it has a place here, it cannot encompass the entire meaning of certain pages. Simply because it falls under Technology as a subcategory does not mean that noting a object's technological significance is unnecessary next to its combat significance; whether or not an automail or machine can act as a weapon, it's technological significance remains separate from that. The Briggs Tank, Mad Bear G and Crocodile are all weapons, yes, but they also represent technological advancements in fields of biomechanics and engineering whose purposes are not necessarily tied to weaponry. If we had any articles on specific or individual firearms, then the Weapons category alone would likely suffice, but for these articles and articles like it, that is not the case. It isn't so much a policy here as a judgment call we've made. So long as an item is both combatively significant and technologically significant, both categories stay. The Item category also serves a purpose, though one admittedly less significant than the Technology tag. There aren't so many categories on this site that overcategorization will become a problem, in any case. CorbeauKarasu 17:19, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, I've been doing some thinking and I think I owe you an apology. I've been rather crass as of late and I really don't want to come off that way. It's true that I am quick to resort to action, then I usually end up regretting a lot of it because I don't think it out. Rather rash, at least online. It is just a wikipeda, big deal, and nowhere near the level to decide to 'hate' someone. We disagreed about the Noah picture, but then finally, we both found a solution to the problem, which I could have just said to begin with, which is what I should have. So, I'll attempt to remember that in future situations. From your edits, I hope you stay around for a bit since you seem to also care about what goes into this site, which is always a good thing to have (if you're working on something).

So, I apologize for being an ass. I have been kinda irritable as of late too due to a lot of tension in my daily life, so sometimes it makes it worse. I'll try and think a little clearer from now on. Tommy-Vercetti 22:04, July 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * First I want to acknowledge you for this - it takes guts to admit when you've made a mistake, especially to other people. I did notice that the tone of your editing has mellowed out and I appreciate the efforts that you're putting into this, even if there are other things going on in your life that are affecting you, which I hope work out.  I feel that as wiki editors we have enough going on and there are so many ideas that we could implement and topics that we could collaboratively work on to continue to make this wiki the go to resource for FMA.  In the end, I feel that it's not worth it for there to be unnecessary stress and bad feelings between editors, because it affects readers and other editors as well who may not be involved.  So I'm glad that we have an understanding with each other and are willing to talk things out.  I look forward to working with you to help make this wiki better.   BrokenSphere  (Talk) 22:23, July 20, 2011 (UTC)