Talk:Rosé's child

Need for this article
The more I think about it, does this kid really need to be counted as a character? I mean, he's a plot point at best. Not that I'm casting my judgment already, but still...would it be more thorough to keep this page around, just for completeness' sake? CorbeauKarasu 23:00, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

I really don't think this should be a page. Its an incredibly minor character.. and not really even a character at that. Just my opinion, though. Final word is up to you. But on that note, I noticed in the page they mention something about Rose's /kids/? There's nothing that implies those are hers.. or that she even had more than one. Especially when you consider the fact they look nothing like her. Nub888 03:23, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

You're right. It's probably more a case of her caring for a bunch of village kids than her considering them her children. CorbeauKarasu 03:27, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

If we keep this article, make it at least ten times shorter... Kiadony 05:46, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Rename?
The child is past the baby stage in the movie. Wouldn't Rosé's child be a better title? BrokenSphere (Talk) 22:01, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Here's my sentiment regarding Rose's baby:

"Who the hell cares?"

I'm so sick of this character. It's not important, it doesn't matter all. We could call it "Rose's tumor" and it would still be accurate. Tommy-Vercetti 22:08, July 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * I've quoted this before:
 * "Full Metal Alchemist(FMA) is a free reference website to everything Full Metal Alchemist (anime,manga,video games, cards, etc.). Its intention is to be an easy reference source for anything Fullmetal."
 * As experienced as you are with this wiki, and this may be a separate issue, I am not seeing why you are still having trouble with this. If you think it doesn't belong, why not propose a deletion or merge into Rose's article? BrokenSphere  (Talk) 22:30, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand that much, but I believe "Rose's child" immediately re-directs to the page anyway, so it's not worth fretting over. It's a throwaway character and its page isn't worth renaming. Trust me, anyone who comes here looking for the kid (and believe me, there are way too many) seems to always find it just fine.Tommy-Vercetti 22:40, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just checked. "Rose's child" doesn't redirect, so I would suggest at least that much, but I don't think it's worth renaming.Tommy-Vercetti 22:41, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just checked. "Rose's child" doesn't redirect, so I would suggest at least that much, but I don't think it's worth renaming.Tommy-Vercetti 22:41, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just checked. "Rose's child" doesn't redirect, so I would suggest at least that much, but I don't think it's worth renaming.Tommy-Vercetti 22:41, July 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think I was one of those people who was looking for this article myself.


 * What hasn't been mentioned is that for the 2003 series, Rose presumably can't be the Holy Mother without a child, so it does play a role. BrokenSphere  (Talk) 23:06, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Like CK said above^
 * That makes it literally a plot device, not a character.Tommy-Vercetti 23:20, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * That makes it literally a plot device, not a character.Tommy-Vercetti 23:20, July 18, 2011 (UTC)