Talk:Dante

Was it ever confirmed that Dante was eaten by Gluttony? I was under the impression that at the moment that Gluttony attacked, Dante had open the Gate and pulled them both in. I believe this because there was no blood in the elevator, Which there would be since Gluttony lack a lower jaw and is quite a messy eater. There's also the fact that the hole in the floor seems too small for the both of them to fall through. If Gluttony was pulled into the gate and managed to escape it, That would explain his appearance in the movie. Rikudou Latios63.214.229.59 06:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Sentence structure
Don't know who changed it, but you need to read up.

Read this. This is how it originally was:

Soon after her meeting with the Elrics, Dante faked her death at the hands of the Homunculus Greed, who is in turn killed by Ed, although it is obvious to the viewer that her body was dead before Greed had arrived.

"Who in turn killed by Ed" That makes no sense. Even just the wording makes no sense, and it's alluding to Greed, who was then killed by Ed. I edited "Who in turn WAS killed by Ed" and someone edited back. Leave it alone. Cornwiggle 19:50, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Age
This has been bothering me since I first saw it.

Dante is stated to be 400 years old, same as Father in the manga. So, then why does it have "date of age" listed as "400 BC" That's 400 years before the year zero. Even in the 2003 anime, FMA takes place in the same time period, around 1914, so wouldn't that make Dante almost 2000 years old? Her date of birth was in the late 1500s, not 400 years before the start of the millennium. Tommy-Vercetti 19:55, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Anon changes
I can't really tell from the history what this last anonymous did to this page, nor am I one to say if it should be reverted or not. CK should take a look at it. I know they erased a picture (for what reason, I have no clue), but can anyone else take a look? It looks like the anon took out the picture, rephrased stuff, but yet deleted lots more. It needs to be checked out at least. Tommy-Vercetti 16:01, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, someone really screwed this up. Thanks for noting it, it's fixed now. --DARK 19:37, October 19, 2010 (UTC)